Quinoa (cooked) vs Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries: calories & macros
Compare as calorias, a proteína, os hidratos de carbono e a gordura de Quinoa (cooked) e Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries por 100 g.
Quinoa (cooked)
Grains
120 kcal/ 100 g
- Proteína: 4.4 g↑
- Hidratos de carbono: 21 g
- Gordura: 1.9 g
Pontuação de saúde: 6/10
Menos calorias
Mais proteína
Ver informação nutricional de Quinoa (cooked)Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries
Grains
140 kcal/ 100 g
- Proteína: 4 g
- Hidratos de carbono: 30 g
- Gordura: 2 g
Pontuação de saúde: 7/10
Ver informação nutricional de Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries| Por 100 g | Quinoa (cooked) | Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries |
|---|---|---|
| kcal | 120 | 140 |
| Proteína | 4.4 g | 4 g |
| Hidratos de carbono | 21 g | 30 g |
| Gordura | 1.9 g | 2 g |
What the numbers say
Per 100 g Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries carries 140 kcal against 120 in Quinoa (cooked) — 20 kcal more, 17% on top. The gap sits in the carbs: 30 g in Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries against 21 g. The same 140 kcal is 100 g of Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries or 117 g of Quinoa (cooked). Quinoa (cooked) fits a tight calorie budget more easily; Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries is the pick when a small volume has to carry the energy.
Registe automaticamente
Digitalize qualquer refeição com a app e obtenha logo uma estimativa de calorias e macronutrientes.
Obter a app