Beet and Feta Quinoa Bowl vs Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries: calories & macros
Compare as calorias, a proteína, os hidratos de carbono e a gordura de Beet and Feta Quinoa Bowl e Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries por 100 g.
Beet and Feta Quinoa Bowl
Grains
160 kcal/ 100 g
- Proteína: 6 g↑
- Hidratos de carbono: 22 g
- Gordura: 6 g
Pontuação de saúde: 9/10
Mais proteína
Ver informação nutricional de Beet and Feta Quinoa BowlWild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries
Grains
140 kcal/ 100 g
- Proteína: 4 g
- Hidratos de carbono: 30 g
- Gordura: 2 g
Pontuação de saúde: 7/10
Menos calorias
Ver informação nutricional de Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries| Por 100 g | Beet and Feta Quinoa Bowl | Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries |
|---|---|---|
| kcal | 160 | 140 |
| Proteína | 6 g | 4 g |
| Hidratos de carbono | 22 g | 30 g |
| Gordura | 6 g | 2 g |
What the numbers say
Per 100 g Beet and Feta Quinoa Bowl carries 160 kcal against 140 in Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries — 20 kcal more, 14% on top. The gap sits in the fat — 6 g in Beet and Feta Quinoa Bowl against 2 g — while carbs runs the other way: 30 g in Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries against 22 g. The same 160 kcal is 100 g of Beet and Feta Quinoa Bowl or 114 g of Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries. Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries fits a tight calorie budget more easily; Beet and Feta Quinoa Bowl is the pick when a small volume has to carry the energy.
Registe automaticamente
Digitalize qualquer refeição com a app e obtenha logo uma estimativa de calorias e macronutrientes.
Obter a app