Beet and Feta Quinoa Bowl vs Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries: calories & macros
Comparez les calories, protéines, glucides et lipides de Beet and Feta Quinoa Bowl et Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries pour 100 g.
Beet and Feta Quinoa Bowl
Grains
160 kcal/ 100 g
- Protéines: 6 g↑
- Glucides: 22 g
- Lipides: 6 g
Score santé: 9/10
Plus de protéines
Valeurs nutritionnelles : Beet and Feta Quinoa BowlWild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries
Grains
140 kcal/ 100 g
- Protéines: 4 g
- Glucides: 30 g
- Lipides: 2 g
Score santé: 7/10
Moins de calories
Valeurs nutritionnelles : Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries| Pour 100 g | Beet and Feta Quinoa Bowl | Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries |
|---|---|---|
| kcal | 160 | 140 |
| Protéines | 6 g | 4 g |
| Glucides | 22 g | 30 g |
| Lipides | 6 g | 2 g |
What the numbers say
Per 100 g Beet and Feta Quinoa Bowl carries 160 kcal against 140 in Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries — 20 kcal more, 14% on top. The gap sits in the fat — 6 g in Beet and Feta Quinoa Bowl against 2 g — while carbs runs the other way: 30 g in Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries against 22 g. The same 160 kcal is 100 g of Beet and Feta Quinoa Bowl or 114 g of Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries. Wild Rice Pilaf with Cranberries fits a tight calorie budget more easily; Beet and Feta Quinoa Bowl is the pick when a small volume has to carry the energy.
Suivez-le automatiquement
Scannez n’importe quel repas avec l’app et obtenez aussitôt une estimation des calories et des macros.
Télécharger l’app